I read today that St. Paul is suing the Alabama High School Athletic Association because of the Association's newly minted “competitive balance” policy--an attempt to keep a fragile coalition of public and private schools in the same athletic league. Private schools which have been successful in certain sports over a three year period are moved up a classification to play larger schools. This is in addition to a 1.35 multiplier that was instituted for private schools in 1999, already bumping them up one classification. So St. Paul, 4A in size without the additional penalties, will be playing at the 6A level in 15 sports next year, including football.
The lawsuit in a federal court alleges the “competitive balance” rule is “motivated by a bare desire to harm and disadvantage a politically unpopular group” and that playing up two divisions puts their athletes in harm's way.
I have no idea if the lawsuit will be successful. But if it is, the A.H.S.A.A. will be under tremendous pressure to remodel itself after the state of Tennessee, which years ago separated the public and private schools into two distinct leagues, each competing for its own championship. I think that would be a dreadful mistake for Alabama.
I’ve been a Catholic school principal for 29 years in three high schools, two in Alabama (Montgomery Catholic High from 1989-2008 and St. Michael Catholic High, 2015-present) and one in Tennessee (Pope John Paul in Nashville, TN, from 2008-2015) . Being a “private school” principal in both states gives me some perspective.
During my tenure at Catholic, we played at the 2A and 3A level against many wonderful, rural public schools, such as Holtville, Reeltown and Elmore County. There were times they womped us, and at other times, we competed and beat them. But over the years, with them hosting us and us hosting them, we grew in mutual respect for each other. I remember one particular Friday night when we visited Holtville (in Slapout!) for a basketball game. The people there were warm and gracious hosts, happy to receive us, representing the best in southern hospitality. The whole town was there, cheering on their boys, led at that time by the Ezell brothers. They killed us that night, but that wasn’t my biggest takeaway. I remembered how run down their school building was, and how that contrasted so powerfully with the pride and joy that community had in their school. Because of that experience, I voted for property tax increases for public schools the next time it was on the ballot.
Contrast that with my time in Tennessee, which separated private and public schools twenty years ago. My school, John Paul II, competed at the “Division II, 2A” level, which was the “large private school” division. Our regular opponents were Baylor, McCallie, Brentwood Academy, Ensworth, MBA and the like. They each charge well over $20,000 year for tuition, and their facilities are breathtakingly beautiful (see pictures below). During my seven year stint as headmaster of JPII, traveling to support our teams, I never had to walk into a Holtville, never had to “compare/contrast” our facilities with those who had less. Neither did our parents. We moved in entirely different circles.
Give the civil rights heroes in our great state their due. Credit the Christian Churches for their role. But I believe the institution that has done more to advance the cause of civil rights and the normalization of black-white, rich-poor relationships in Alabama is the Alabama High School Athletic Association. It connects communities that otherwise simply wouldn’t be connected. It humanizes relationships that would otherwise be faceless abstractions.
If we divorce ourselves from each other, it will be a great step backwards for our state.
Still, I am sympathetic to the “political” problem confronting the AHSAA—namely, that a majority of its members believe that the private schools cheat, by offering scholarships to athletes to enroll in their school. I don’t want to debate that point, except to say that successful programs generally attract good athletes to join them, be that at St. Paul, Madison Academy, Hoover or Mountainbrook.
Here’s what I’d suggest instead: If indeed, programs “recruit” athletes and then offer them financial aid as inducements, then the percentages of athletes on financial aid would be greatly disproportionate to the general school population. On eligibility rosters submitted to the AHSAA for each team and signed by principals, then, the AHSAA could simply ask the principal to declare what percentage of that team was on financial aid, and what percentage of the student body was on financial aid. Those two percentages should not, on average, vary wildly. If they did over a couple of year period (to allow for statistical anomalies) that could become a “trigger” for the AHSAA to investigate the program more closely or to penalize that school for continued incongruities in its financial aid practices.
I don’t think the AHSAA wants to penalize schools for giving aid, as that policy harms needy families, discriminating in favor of the wealthy, who don’t need it. But it’s perfectly reasonable for the AHSAA to expect that its schools treat athletes as they would the rest of their student body.
The lawsuit in a federal court alleges the “competitive balance” rule is “motivated by a bare desire to harm and disadvantage a politically unpopular group” and that playing up two divisions puts their athletes in harm's way.
I have no idea if the lawsuit will be successful. But if it is, the A.H.S.A.A. will be under tremendous pressure to remodel itself after the state of Tennessee, which years ago separated the public and private schools into two distinct leagues, each competing for its own championship. I think that would be a dreadful mistake for Alabama.
I’ve been a Catholic school principal for 29 years in three high schools, two in Alabama (Montgomery Catholic High from 1989-2008 and St. Michael Catholic High, 2015-present) and one in Tennessee (Pope John Paul in Nashville, TN, from 2008-2015) . Being a “private school” principal in both states gives me some perspective.
During my tenure at Catholic, we played at the 2A and 3A level against many wonderful, rural public schools, such as Holtville, Reeltown and Elmore County. There were times they womped us, and at other times, we competed and beat them. But over the years, with them hosting us and us hosting them, we grew in mutual respect for each other. I remember one particular Friday night when we visited Holtville (in Slapout!) for a basketball game. The people there were warm and gracious hosts, happy to receive us, representing the best in southern hospitality. The whole town was there, cheering on their boys, led at that time by the Ezell brothers. They killed us that night, but that wasn’t my biggest takeaway. I remembered how run down their school building was, and how that contrasted so powerfully with the pride and joy that community had in their school. Because of that experience, I voted for property tax increases for public schools the next time it was on the ballot.
Contrast that with my time in Tennessee, which separated private and public schools twenty years ago. My school, John Paul II, competed at the “Division II, 2A” level, which was the “large private school” division. Our regular opponents were Baylor, McCallie, Brentwood Academy, Ensworth, MBA and the like. They each charge well over $20,000 year for tuition, and their facilities are breathtakingly beautiful (see pictures below). During my seven year stint as headmaster of JPII, traveling to support our teams, I never had to walk into a Holtville, never had to “compare/contrast” our facilities with those who had less. Neither did our parents. We moved in entirely different circles.
Baylor School, Chattanooga |
New natatorium, Ensworth HS (Nashville) |
Still, I am sympathetic to the “political” problem confronting the AHSAA—namely, that a majority of its members believe that the private schools cheat, by offering scholarships to athletes to enroll in their school. I don’t want to debate that point, except to say that successful programs generally attract good athletes to join them, be that at St. Paul, Madison Academy, Hoover or Mountainbrook.
The dining hall, Montgomery Bell Academy (Nashville) |
Here’s what I’d suggest instead: If indeed, programs “recruit” athletes and then offer them financial aid as inducements, then the percentages of athletes on financial aid would be greatly disproportionate to the general school population. On eligibility rosters submitted to the AHSAA for each team and signed by principals, then, the AHSAA could simply ask the principal to declare what percentage of that team was on financial aid, and what percentage of the student body was on financial aid. Those two percentages should not, on average, vary wildly. If they did over a couple of year period (to allow for statistical anomalies) that could become a “trigger” for the AHSAA to investigate the program more closely or to penalize that school for continued incongruities in its financial aid practices.
I don’t think the AHSAA wants to penalize schools for giving aid, as that policy harms needy families, discriminating in favor of the wealthy, who don’t need it. But it’s perfectly reasonable for the AHSAA to expect that its schools treat athletes as they would the rest of their student body.
No comments:
Post a Comment